Jump to content
Curious Cosmos
Syzygy

Time travel without destroying the universe

Recommended Posts

How to Time Travel (Without Destroying the Universe) Part One | Tor ...

www.tor.com/2013/11/06/story-worlds-time-travel-part-1/

 

Time Travel Without Consequence: From Mark Twain to Woody Allen.

 

How to Time Travel (Without Destroying the Universe) Part Two | Tor ...

www.tor.com/2013/11/13/story-worlds-time-travel-part-2/

Nov 13, 2013 ... Welcome back, time travelers! Last week, we took a look at some common methods of time travel in books, movies, and TV shows—including ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Science.

 

Do you know this?

 

Do you know that?

 

What? Science is based on math and facts.

 

Sorry, link collector.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The initial links in this thread are about movies, which are directly relevant to this section. The story/screen writers familiarized themselves with theories in regard to time travel and, in doing so, realized that some involve paradoxes that run counter to reality as most sane people know it. Some of them demonstrate those inconsistencies while others are more interested in projecting actual possibilities.

 

Lighten up, sourpuss, and do as would do any movie goer who is interested in time travel: select and watch whichever movie most appeals to you and, then, if you're inclined to objectively discuss the film's merits and shortcomings, provide us a review.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ok guys, be nice. She put a description under her links, so we have allowed them.

 

Would you rather we copied articles?

 

I have uncertainties about what might be construed copyright infringements, e.g. should we ever post copyrighted images?

 

Re: Sawsee, maybe I shouldn't pun about his avatar? e.g. Sourpuss

 

https://s17-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=http%3A%2F%2Ft1.gstatic.com%2Fimages%3Fq%3Dtbn%3AANd9GcSLW-oLMEQAWBzEk-qYGmHcAFsZOwytZ0c5pdI9v-oC4drEEm4xFQ&sp=0600e66150dc5f1fac0a485be23b99d9

 

&

nice pussycat

 

https://s17-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=https%3A%2F%2Fs-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com%2F236x%2F3e%2Fdf%2Fd9%2F3edfd9e668676cf349b52556abe8f8a6.jpg&sp=75f4d28b67cea058729a10533fe18fd9

 

Thank you. I can put as medal you expression "sourpuss ".

 

A medal should put a smile on your face. Are you smiling yet?

 

serveimage?url=http%3A%2F%2Ft1.gstatic.com%2Fimages%3Fq%3Dtbn%3AANd9GcTypMnIRF1rZeFQn4OxDatZpF98wF5RBAOCuBQUDUMayH_5QkdV&sp=d65731dde5c9dd31f834127d30ff738c

How about now?

 

serveimage?url=http%3A%2F%2Ft3.gstatic.com%2Fimages%3Fq%3Dtbn%3AANd9GcRFQU6Ky56LDjROBDyXJ8Ay38FDsLbiGDdzX1bOdLzSyeIKGORkQA&sp=2c7f136db85f919c444ce6f9d5eb8d26

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Someone struck you with a hammer? Granted life's lessons can be hard,

 

I'd not want to speculate as to what err might or might not elicit such a response-- what about the other three times?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It was me.

 

1- at 2 years old

2- at 4-5 years old 3 month in hospital

3- at 14 years old

4- 52 years old too painful

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The same thing repeatedly?

 

If so, I cannot understand what would compel someone to do such a thing, i.e. unless the first time were an accident that knocked you senseless, but, then, your aptitude for languages suggests you've intelligence left that is worth preserving. After all, you are bright enough to seek viable solutions.

 

Peace be with you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have uncertainties about what might be construed copyright infringements, e.g. should we ever post copyrighted images?

I suppose we need to outline this better in our rules section. Basically:

  1. Don't post threads or replies that are ONLY outside links. Provide some commentary get the discussion going
  2. Don't copy/paste whole articles from other sites. This denies the other site ad revenue, and doesn't tell us what YOUR thoughts on it are. Paste 1/4 or 1/3, link to the source and tell us what your thoughts on it are.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a thought that we could neither create nor destroy matter, but would just change into energy?

If that is true, as it may very well be, then the universe would just evolve and maybe reform?

The other idea I had was the issue that humans are not able to understand how the "Cosmos work because we are more like hairless monkeys?

So as one hairless monkey to another, I share my opinion as just another opinion.

Multiverse may not be as we may understand, but it may be that there are many dimensions operation a many different frequencies?

What we may perceive is are changes some have observed caused be a few people that travel back in time that may be the cause of those changes?

That could be the cause of the multiverse theory? Just a SWAG!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Science is based on math and facts.

 

 

Not according to Nobel Physicist Richard Feynman:

 

"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts"

 

Richard Feynman - Wikiquote

 

Physics is full of models that are understood to not be "facts".

The term "Law" has not been used in Physics for a long time. Ohms law was proven not to be a "law".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...