Jump to content
Curious Cosmos
RainmanTime

INTENTION->Information->Energy->Force Creation

Recommended Posts

Each Human Free Will Posseses The Ability To FREEly Express Its INTENTION.

|

Each Intention Takes In And Gives Off Information To Create Its Free Will.

|

Each Intention Takes In And Gives Off Energy To Create Its Free Will.

|

Each Intention Takes In And Gives Off Force To Create Its Free Will.

|

|

|

FORCE, ACCELERATION, and GRAVITY are the Fundamental Physical Metrics Of Our Interactive Universe.

|

|

|

RMT

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that intent an free will are two sides of the same coin. As you can't intend without free will and you cant have free will without an intention. And i also read your equation as suggesting this on some level.

 

I don't think i know exactly what RMT is saying as i might have read what he is eluding to wrong, but it seems to me that from looking at his equation, the he is of the opinion that the universe consists of Energy that originates ultimately from intention (and freewill). Or in other words conscious intent. Only i know that he is not the sort of person to phrase it like that, as its not precise enough for him.

 

Intenion breeds energy which becomes the forces that we can measure in the 3-D. It would also indicate that we can tap into the higher dimensions of information that originates from intention and freewill. An 'absolute' record of all past information connected to free will and intention.

 

Which may be what some people call the Akashic records (please feel free to stop me RMT if you think i have this wrong). And what RV'ers and such like sometimes access to achieve their purpose, Or rather, their intention to extract specific information.

 

 

( If you had just created the 'Grand' universe out of yourself, and you wanted to learn about it in all possible ways. There is only one way to do this and that is by seperating yourself from the knowledge that you have created it. So you could explore it in an unbiased manner including (to name one example) the mental perception that you are subject to it rather the other way around )

 

Its almost a voyage or self discovery that is carried out via self expression. You can't do this without free will This includes all negative and positive expressions of intent.

 

Its literally like creating your very own matrix and then subjecting yourself to experience all effects with in it. Which at some points will include lossing the perception of unity and experiencing complete separation. Which is about the stage we are slowing starting to re-evaluate on a conscious level on this planet now. infact, RMT's 'physical matrix' is a good term, as it also illustrates that you'd need to also be subject to physicality in some why to experience it fully. A good way to do this would be to jump inside a physical body and evolve through living it!!

 

i believe that there are many other physical/non-physical matrixs that we will live and evolve within after this one.

 

But i'm going off-topic now...

 

kindest regards,

Olly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I should also point out that i am of the opinion that Astral time travel is simply another variant of Remote viewing. And this may not be that the 'Astral body' as it is terms, actually travels in time, but rather views and relays information from a higher dimension - Like downloading the information you need via conscious intent and direction. Similar to how dreams are also downloaded interpretations from higher dimensions of information. Which is often why the two are sometimes linked.

 

The Akashic records are not subject to linear time, so it would also be correct to say that its stores records of what we would also percieive as future information.

 

I'm also just trying to link some of this subject matter back to time travel to show that it should still of interest for a lot of people, regardless of its untestable and abstract nature.

 

kindest regards,

Olly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great post, Olly!

 

I think that intent an free will are two sides of the same coin.

 

Yes, this is one way to think of it. Another (possibly more instructive) way to look at it would be as opposing points on a circle...a closed loop (another one of my favorite technical topics). Furthermore, we can align these two opposing points on a closed circle with two other major "events" called Life and Death. The popular view is to see Life as a straight line with a beginning (birth) and an end (death). But if we change our view and use the predominant shape of the universe (the circle) we can see that path from birth to death is one half of a closed loop. The other half is from death to life. We can then make the final relationship as:

 

LIFE is to FREE WILL as DEATH is to INTENTION. IOW: During LIFE we can exercise our FREE WILL to Create anything we wish. During DEATH we review our life's creations in an attempt to determine what we INTEND to do in our next life. A case for reincarnation, perhaps? :)

 

Intenion breeds energy which becomes the forces that we can measure in the 3-D.

 

Yes, but don't forget the Information. Intention can only achieve the Energy states required to manifest 3-D Force by way of Information (the Akashic Records).

 

Which may be what some people call the Akashic records (please feel free to stop me RMT if you think i have this wrong). And what RV'ers and such like sometimes access to achieve their purpose, Or rather, their intention to extract specific information.

 

By golly Olly, you've hit the nail on the head! The Akashic Records are the SUM TOTAL OF ALL INFORMATION (including that information that describes things that have already occurred, have yet to occur, or may not ever occur within our current universe). It is the vast sea of ALL possibilities.

 

And you are also correct that the Akashic Records are "outside" of our thought and perception of linear time. This is what I believe I have quantified with my equation "I = ms^3". If "s^3" is any volume, and you set s^3 equal to the bounds of our known universe and "m" is the total mass enclosed within that volume, then my equation claims that this is what defines the sum total of the Akashic Records: ALL Matter and ALL Space, regardless of TIME.

 

Its literally like creating your very own matrix and then subjecting yourself to experience all effects with in it. Which at some points will include lossing the perception of unity and experiencing complete separation. Which is about the stage we are slowing starting to re-evaluate on a conscious level on this planet now. infact, RMT's 'physical matrix' is a good term, as it also illustrates that you'd need to also be subject to physicality in some why to experience it fully. A good way to do this would be to jump inside a physical body and evolve through living it!!

 

You are dead-on Olly. Very good, indeed! The most obvious place to see this evolution (and where it is heading to) is by viewing our past evolution. And this is precisely what I am trying to show with how the Age of Force lead to the Age of Energy which lead to our current Age of Information. Each new age represents an understanding of a larger piece of the whole universe, and how it works. Even though we "naturally" evolved through these ages (thanks to Science) it shows that there is a natural "plan" built into the universe, and it can only go in one direction!

 

Next Stop: The Age of Intention! The age in which we finally come to PROVE that there is a life BEYOND our "Triplex Physical Matrix of Massive SpaceTime". That "life" beyond Massive SpaceTime is "the other side"...the spiritual side.

 

Now, I know there are people out there who will continue to deny it, but this IS the age we are living in. And to those who do not accept the new reality (which the merging of Science with Spirituality will bring forth) are unfortunately going to be the ones "Left Behind" (and I don't mean that in a Catholic/Christian sense, or in any sense associated with any man-made religion). And what is odd is that there will be "people of science" left behind because they cannot accept the spiritual element, and there will also be "people of religion" left behind because they cannot accept the science that may tell them their man-made religion had some things wrong (in an attempt to CONTROL your Energy!) Yes, those who will NOT be "Left Behind" are those who can successfully integrate the important lessons of BOTH Science AND Spirituality.

 

RMT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I should also point out that i am of the opinion that Astral time travel is simply another variant of Remote viewing. And this may not be that the 'Astral body' as it is terms, actually travels in time, but rather views and relays information from a higher dimension - Like downloading the information you need via conscious intent and direction. Similar to how dreams are also downloaded interpretations from higher dimensions of information. Which is often why the two are sometimes linked.

 

I agree. And there is one thing that we should note about the human body: We are polarized, just like an antenna!

 

INFORMATION comes in at the head and Mass and Space (i.e. we ingest food which is Mass that occupies Space). And our senses of sight, smell, taste are also based upon Mass and Space. And while we do not think of it as such, stuff that comes out the other end is also INFORMATION (waste products and either sperm from the male or the complete baby from the female). All of this information in the form of Mass that occupies a specific Space.

 

The Akashic records are not subject to linear time, so it would also be correct to say that its stores records of what we would also percieive as future information.

 

And as I always like to point out, it also contains information that is neither past, nor present, nor future in OUR universe. When we say the Akashic Records contain ALL information we must not fall prey to the tendency to limit it to our experience within our universe.

 

I'm also just trying to link some of this subject matter back to time travel to show that it should still of interest for a lot of people, regardless of its untestable and abstract nature.

 

 

Another thing I always say is that we must FIRST come to an understanding of what Time is (an illusion of convenience for our linear perceptions) before we can understand how to travel beyond it.

 

Good work, Olly!

RMT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Iridium, the completely misunderstood big question about 'free will' is of course, is there really such a thing as free choice? The answer is YES! And it's as simple as this… We all have free choice – it's whether or not you are going to connect or not connect to 'source'. Source - being in rapport with nature and nature using the instructed design and energy force of G-d. A good example of this instructed design is the logarithmic spiral found in nature, which helps create structures that are incredibly strong and where only the strongest species and structures survive.

 

All of our struggles, all of our illnesses, all of the scarcities in our lives, all of the problems we have in our relationships… all of this stuff comes about because we 'disconnected' ourselves from a field of 'intention' that is nothing but 'well being' at work. As it says in the good book at the very opening pages of Genesis, G-d (source) cannot be anything else other than what it is – which is good! On all the days of creation G-d saw that his creation 'was good'.

 

Therefore, every thought that you have that is other than that which you "emanated" from is "resistance". It encompasses every unkind though, every uncreative thought, every thought of judgment, every thought of fear, every thought of depression – 'all resistance' and we loose our connection with 'source'. You see because the creative source reacts to your beliefs with a fulfillment of your beliefs. So if you're praying about what's missing in your life and ask for it to be fixed, you'll have your belief in what's missing fulfilled and refocused for you. The universe/G-d/source only conspires with you, when you surrender to loving receptivity which includes practicing radical humility where you begin to realize that you are not this body that you are in, you are not this mind you are in, you are not any of the possessions that you have, you are a divine source. Also practice being in a constant state of gratitude and happiness, because you see, happiness in something you decide about ahead of time… its how you arrange the mind.

 

I should also point out that i am of the opinion that Astral time travel is simply another variant of Remote viewing. And this may not be that the 'Astral body' as it is terms, actually travels in time, but rather views and relays information from a higher dimension - Like downloading the information you need via conscious intent and direction. Similar to how dreams are also downloaded interpretations from higher dimensions of information. Which is often why the two are sometimes linked.

 

 

Well Olly, this is a huge debated and (another) completely misunderstood subject. Well firstly to understand what 'consciousness' is? Let say (for what ever reasons) one finds themselves unconscious… breathing is slowed and regular, your heart is beating and although your pulse is weak, it is there. You have lost consciousness, but your body has not. It seems to be functioning quit well and appears to have its own consciousness that directs the activity of the organs. Let us call this 'rudimentary' consciousness. It is the 'wisdom of the inner parts' of the body. Now the rudimentary body does not seem to worry about the head/brain. It is some other consciousness that worries about it. There appears to be two kinds of consciousness occupying our body, one is 'higher consciousness', which is easily dislodged from our body by mild unconsciousness, then there is another more rudimentary consciousness, which knows how to run a body even when the higher consciousness is gone. Then there could be a worse case… suppose you are closer to death. The rudimentary consciousness will do its best to keep the body going, but when it sees that the situation is beyond repair, it will also pull out and get 'lost'. Than you go through the process of dying as the rudimentary consciousness extracts itself slowly from the body… sooner or later the body becomes really dead and both consciousnesses depart.

 

Now when this happens, consciousness 'reflects' a copy of itself outside the bounds of the physical body, either while it sleeps or during any kind of conscious OBE. This reflection is a kind of energetic echo containing a complete copy of consciousness, mind and memory outside the physical body.

 

Now 'if' during sleep or conscious OBE the etheric mind can stay awake in the trance state, it is capable of recording a 'dream memory' directly into the physical brains storage mechanism of the physical brain. This reflected reentry is crucial (for memory) and if handled intelligently can capture and download the projected/reflected doubles (duplicate shadow memories) into accessible levels of the brain during reintegration. Ironically, this is why most people fail to remember their dreams or recognized that they had dreamed at all (I await the day that spirituality can teach a thing or two to science).

 

Now to understand the 'reintegration process' better, this base level replaces any higher levels of consciousness and 'overwrites' any memories gained independently by consciousness on higher levels… the stronger base level 'replaces and overwrites' the higher level. The lowest level of consciousness always replaces and overwrites any higher level… other memories are lost or downloaded into inaccessible levels of subconscious mind and memory – they have to be stored in simple base level format if they are to be recognized and remembered by the physical brain.

 

This also brings up another unproven debate on UFO and alien abductions… We are not actually 'physically' taken by these aliens… they know how to induce this 'reflected state' in us simply because they are already in the 'spiritual or etheric' state/realm. Their purpose with us of course is our physical body because they are 'what the good book has claimed' fallen angels who were cast out of Heaven. They were originally made perpetual spirit beings to serve G-d on a continual bases… They live forever and were not made to create, procreate and bare offspring. When they were cast out of Heaven they yearned for the physical body. And this is why they abduct us and try to interbreed with us…

 

So yes, they are "real" in a spiritual sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well, i read this board every single day looking for an interesting read, and this particular thread made me curious. i see you guys regularly blast people who claim to went back in time and met with moses or god or whom ever, also get onto people who are obviously religious. now from this post it seem as though you believe in a spiritual aspect of life? does that mean you believe in life after death or am i mistaken? i am just curious. also what is the deal with this whole remote veiwing astral traveling thing. i would never claim to have traveled through time, but for some reason i do have very vivid dreams of the future, some of them near future, and some of them many years away. it may sound crazy but more than a couple of them in the past seem to have happened, and it is sort of freaky when it happens, so what are your thoughts on that? would be very interested to know. i would be more than happy to put some of them out there for your amusement, and if they are wrong so be it, i am making no claim,...but if they happen....well who knows.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good post, CAT.

 

And not to ignore the points you made in it, but I think it is time for me to connect a few more dots with respect to the title of this thread. In fact, to those who are able to "get it" it may end up being one BIG dot connection! ;)

 

As most of you know, I am a SYSTEMS engineer, and one of the disciplines I teach in the aerospace engineering department at Cal Poly, Pomona is SYSTEMS engineering. I have also made it very clear that it is my belief that the precepts of closed-loop control SYSTEMS provide some very deep insights into what our universe, and ourselves, are all about. So in summary of this, SYSTEMS THEORY is the branch of science that I believe will show the greatest success in merging with the concepts of spirituality. And now it is TIME I explain one very large connection between SYSTEMS and the progression of INTENTION->Information->Energy->Force as forming the constructs of Creation and Perception in our universe...

 

We analyze any SYSTEM by separating it from the rest of the universe, defining its INPUTS and OUTPUTS and quantifying the performance of the FUNCTIONS that operate on the INPUTS to Create the OUTPUTS. Well, here is the "connect the dots" part: We can classify ANY and ALL of the INPUTS and OUTPUTS to/from a SYSTEM into three distinct categories.

 

Any active SYSTEM in our universe has INPUTS that can be classified into: Information, Energy, & Force. The same is true of any SYSTEM'S OUTPUTS. And all you need to do is look at the most amazing SYSTEM that we know of, the human body, to see the undeniable truth of this. The FORCES of Nature act upon our body in ways that allow our physical body to exist, as well as causing our physical body to age. Furthermore, our bodies exert FORCES on the things in our environment around us as a means to Create the world we wish to live in. Our bodies require ENERGY as an INPUT (food, water, heat, and air) in order for our physical body to survive. Furthermore, our bodies give off ENERGY as OUTPUTS (heat, waste products, and the motions that we exhibit as we exert FORCES). Finally, our senses (and our faculties beyond our senses) deliver INFORMATION to us as INPUTS that we use to make decisions about what we are perceiving and what we wish to Create next. Furthermore, the motions of our bodies give off INFORMATION as an OUTPUT that can be perceived as INPUTS by other beings.

 

Is this not clear? Can we not see that the SYSTEMS that are our human bodies operate on, and generate FORCE, ENERGY, and INFORMATION, just as does any other SYSTEM in our universe? And if we can all see and agree this is true, then the connection to INTENTION should be obvious.... it is that One, Single, Endless, Omnipresent, FIELD OF INTENTION from which all Information, Energy, and Force flows! Call it "The Source", call it "The Force", or call it "God"... it is actually beyond any kind of name. That field of INTENTION is responsible for all that is, because no SYSTEM could come into being or continue to operate without the emanations of Information, Energy, and Force that it provides to this universe, which is the Creation of INTENTION!

 

And each and every one of us, with our Free Will, is a finite piece of that infinite field of INTENTION.

 

RMT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, i get the whole force, source, god thing, but what are you saying about our physical selves, when who we are, our brain, dies? what then? do we just become part of this endless source and recycle back into this big circle of creation? and what of the other question i ask about the viewing, projecting thing? does it have any revelance to anything, or is it just another grasp by so called time travelers who can't possibly have the scientific knowledge about time machine production. a way to say, well, i didn't really go with my body in a really neat machine, but my brain went?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Greetings eyecare,

but what are you saying about our physical selves, when who we are, our brain, dies? what then? do we just become part of this endless source and recycle back into this big circle of creation?

 

Almost. You already ARE part of that endless source. As CAT said, we are not our bodies, we are not even our minds. You, at the core of who and what you are, are pure INTENTION. In your physical body you have an ability that the vast sea of Intention does not have: The ability to manifest your Intention and experience that manifestation. This is why the closed-loop of Creation and Perception is central to physical existence. It is the only means by which INTENTION can make something manifest so as to experience the result of Intention. Experience is a reflection of our Intention.

and what of the other question i ask about the viewing, projecting thing? does it have any revelance to anything, or is it just another grasp by so called time travelers who can't possibly have the scientific knowledge about time machine production.

 

I have said on this forum quite often that I do not believe the "romantic" notion of time travel described in books and movies can ever come about. And furthermore I believe that the scientific basis I am putting forth with Massive SpaceTime and the layers of Information/Energy/Force show this clearly. You won't violate the "barrier" of linear time at the level of Force. You won't even be able to do it at the level of Energy. As we can see with movies and interactive rides (such as those at Disneyland) we are approaching the ability to do it by integrating the technologies of Force and Energy with Information. IOW we can appear to travel to another time with such devices, but only as a passive observer. What this progression of development is implying with regard to the hierarchy I lay out in this thread is the following: We will ONLY be able to "travel in Time" by integrating Force+Energy+Information in addition to ascending above the level of Information and passing through the vast sea of INTENTION. And to do this we will NOT be able to maintain the shape and form of our current bodies. One way that this is currently done is through astral travel, but we are on the verge (as we finish the age of Information and usher in the age of INTENTION) of developing a new way.

 

a way to say, well, i didn't really go with my body in a really neat machine, but my brain went?

 

Well, your brain is a physical "machine", but I think I know what you meant. Maybe I can help you, and others, understand by aligning the four layers that are the title of this thread with the four layers of our being. Let's go from bottom-to-top:

 

Force -> Our physical body, which includes our Central Processing Unit (brain).

Energy -> Our conscious mind, or "meta-body/brain" which executes on/in our brain.

Information -> Our subconscious mind, or soul (which Freud told us operates on symbolism...information) which is a higher-level, non-linear process executing on/in our brain.

INTENTION -> Our spirit, which although it is connected to our soul/mind/brain, is NOT limited to our bodies or our brains. Our spirits span infinite space... the entire vast sea of Intention. At this level, we all are truly One. It is only through how this Intention focuses on the lower levels that we express ourselves as being different, and separate.

 

Did that help? And again, I wish to call attention to the fact that I am connecting spiritual concepts with existing science. I cannot (yet) provide "scientific evidence that would be acceptable as proof" that this is true. However, each person can read and contemplate what I am presenting and come to their own conclusion if the connection is really there.

 

RMT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ray, thanks for the 'good post' remark!

 

But another great thought has just occurred to me… There may not be proof (or enough proof) of such 'spiritual separation', but a startling strange one comes to mind and although it may sound religious in nature, I'm going to spill the beans anyways…

 

In realizing that material things are an illusion of empty space… Their solidity is an illusion created by the electro magnetic force field that binds the atoms together. On the sub atomic level all interactions and contact begins with the exchange of photons between the atoms of objects. But when we change our perception of the body (where most people think of their body as molecules, flesh and bones). And realize that the body is also an electromagnetic field, and a body of light where everything that happens in our body is a result of the electromagnetic fluctuations of photons…

 

Given that, some say the laws of nature cant be broken! But how do we really know what the laws of nature are pertaining to the material body? For example, Jesus resurrection… the more I read the story I'm beginning to see some similarities… One being that strangely after Jesus death, within a week the disciples who went into 'hiding' are now out 'confidently' preaching. Something must have sincerely made them believe that He was resurrected… however that happened, they were convinced and gained a 'new knowledge' that they could also go out, and the worst that might happen to them is they might get killed, and He was too, and look if He could beat death, than so could they…

 

Even James, Jesus brother who originally thought He was crazy was later convinced and shortly after was stoned to death…

 

It also mentions that the disciples didn't recognize Jesus at first. And that was because the astral body appears a little different. And in Jesus case, it probably looked better than its earthly image. He was a man with a mission in life and still remained a man with a mission after death...

 

Well, I cant say much for science, evidence or proof, but it can be argued that more has happened in Israel to change the world than any where else on earth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, i agree CATS astral post was pretty good. And verly likely the case.

 

Only - what makes you think the aliens were cast out of heaven?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Only - what makes you think the aliens were cast out of heaven?

 

 

It makes an attempt to describe them in the Bible… Only it doesn't describe them as per say, aliens. But what is alien??? It's something unfamiliar, unknown, strange, foreign and unidentified.

 

However the Bible does specify that they are light beings. We are in a sense too, but what separates us from them is the diminution of light. The diminution of light is separated by the upper and lower worlds from higher degrees of existence to lower ones, a chain of downward gradation, permutation and emanation of life forms.

 

And this is why certain things are visible to our human eyes while others are not…

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

CAT,

However the Bible does specify that they are light beings. We are in a sense too, but what separates us from them is the diminution of light.

 

Yes, indeed and this comment is right on que. For isn't it interesting how Einstein's treatise on light and "c" was the driving discovery that helped us transition from the age of Energy to the age of Information? It is my thought that as we live through our current age of Information that we are coming to learn how Life and Creation exists on both sides of the "barrier" which we call the speed of light... or as you rightly point out as simply another diminution. It is obvious and we would all agree that we are sub-light Beings. The fact that there are supra-light Beings is what we are going to have to come to grips with, once and for all.

The diminution of light is separated by the upper and lower worlds from higher degrees of existence to lower ones, a chain of downward gradation, permutation and emanation of life forms.

 

 

Well, of course. And to resurrect a thought that we discussed back in the days of the "God?" thread and good ole trollface: Isn't it interesting how humans are Beings centered on the Information of DNA, and how our DNA is nothing more than a lower grade of emanation of the Creative Force?

 

Please...keep sharing your pertinent thoughts on these topics. We all need to help each other pass from the age of Information on to the age of Intention! ;) And perhaps it is Time for me to start a new thread that further connects some contemporary issues in physics with respect to standard, quantum, string, brane, and M theories? 10 or 11? :)

 

RMT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Others Are Catching On!

 

Check out this paper (emphases included are mine). John Titor claimed to be a time traveler who was telling you about our future, which is of course hogwash. I am an engineer who dabbles in the theoretical sciences. I don't claim to be a time traveler, nor make any other wild, unbelievable claims. And yet I am telling you about how our past and present are leading to a VERY clear view of what our future will become! And unlike John Titor, I won't "run away" from the predictions I am laying out in these posts. ;)

 

RMT

 

> "Nature Physics 1, 2-4 (2005)

> doi:10.1038/nphys134

> Is information the key?

> Gilles Brassard1

> 0.Gilles Brassard is in the Dpartement d'informatique et de

> recherche oprationnelle, Universit de Montral, Qubec H3C

> 3J7, Canada. e-mail: [email protected]

>

> Abstract

> Quantum information science has brought us novel means of

> calculation and communication. But could its theorems hold the key

> to understanding the quantum world at its most profound level? Do

> the truly fundamental laws of nature concern — not waves and

> particles — but information?

>

> Imagine, what if all of quantum mechanics could be derived simply

> by taking those two quantum cryptographic theorems as axioms?

>

> This year marks the centenary of quantum mechanics. Despite earlier

> work by Max Planck, it was Albert Einstein's Nobel prize-winning

> 1905 paper 1 on the photoelectric effect that gave us what is

> arguably the greatest scientific theory of all time. Subsequently,

> the stones that make up the exquisite structure of quantum

> mechanics were laid out, one by one, by a stream of legendary

> giants such as Niels Bohr, Erwin Schrödinger and Werner

> Heisenberg — sometimes to the horror of Einstein. An almost

> inevitable consequence of this collective foundational effort over

> so many years is that quantum mechanics, for all its elegance, is

> built upon a rather disjointed, ad hoc set of axioms.

>

> Quantum mechanics has forced us to rethink the nature of the

> physical world, its teachings often running counter to our

> misleading macroscopic experience. It is time to pause and reflect

> on what we've learned in the course of these 100 years. Alongside

> Christopher Fuchs 2, I contend that there is a fresh perspective to

> be taken on the axioms of quantum mechanics that could yield a more

> satisfactory foundation for the theory.

>

> New horizons

> Quantum mechanics has changed our outlook on the world. The

> transistor, the laser, superconductivity, the atomic bomb — these

> early applications of the theory are but a few among those that

> have reshaped the way we live. The transistor made possible a

> dramatic increase in computation speed. However, given enough time,

> cog-and-wheels devices such as Charles Babbage's analytical engine

> are, in principle, capable of the same calculations. In a very real

> sense, the modern electronic computer is essentially a classical

> device. Could genuinely quantum-mechanical effects be harnessed for

> computing purposes?

>

> In the early 1980s, it occurred to Richard Feynman 3 and David

> Deutsch 4 that a quantum computer could become so efficient that it

> would far outperform its classical counterpart. For example, an

> atom can be simultaneously in its ground and excited states. If we

> assign classical bit 0 to one state and bit 1 to the other (Fig.

> 1), this gives us a quantum bit, or qubit. If we string together

> ten qubits, they can be collectively in all 1024 classical states

> of ten bits, and we can compute using all those states in parallel.

> If we replace those ten qubits by one thousand, we obtain 2^1,000

> (roughly 10^301) simultaneous operations. This entails an amount of

> parallelism that could not be matched by a classical computer the

> size of the Universe, in which each elementary particle would be

> harnessed as a processing unit.

>

> Figure 1 - Assign classical bits 0 and 1 to, for example, the

> ground and excited states of an atom, and the power of quantum

> computation is unleashed.

>

> But, even if the quantum computer existed, could it perform

> calculations that are impossible in the classical world?

>

> Quantum computing was at first regarded as a mere theoretical

> concept, but interest in it grew when Peter Shor discovered a way

> to use its capabilities to factorize large numbers efficiently 5.

> Such a computer would threaten the public-key cryptographic schemes

> currently in use, in particular for the secure transmission of

> credit card numbers over the Internet. Electronic commerce in its

> current form is saved from a catastrophic collapse only because the

> construction of a full-size quantum computer is, for the moment,

> eluding our technological capabilities. And we can only shiver to

> think of the effect that such a collapse of classical cryptography

> could have on national security. Even though the potential of

> quantum computers is mind-boggling, that does not change the

> theoretical notion of what is computable. The mathematical theory

> of computability is rooted in the 1936 groundbreaking work of Alan

> Turing 6. According to this theory, a problem is deemed to be

> computable if an algorithm can solve it, no matter how long it

> would take — even, indeed, should it take longer than the lifetime

> of the Universe. From this perspective, quantum computers can only

> solve problems that are already classically computable.

>

> Enter cryptography

> This begs the question: are there information-processing tasks that

> are impossible even in principle in the classical world, but that

> become possible through quantum mechanics? Even though unpublished

> for nearly fifteen years, the answer came to Stephen Wiesner well

> before anyone had thought of quantum computing. Around 1970, he

> discovered that quantum-mechanical effects could be used to produce

> banknotes that would be impossible to counterfeit 7. Because

> quantum information cannot be cloned, Wiesner realized that a

> banknote that contained quantum information would be impossible to

> copy. Unfortunately, this revolutionary (albeit impractical) idea

> went completely unnoticed, except by Wiesner's former undergraduate

> classmate Charles H. Bennett.

>

> Almost a decade elapsed before Bennett told me of Wiesner's idea,

> which led to our joint invention of quantum cryptography 8, 9. For

> ages, mathematicians had searched for a system that would allow two

> people to exchange messages in absolute secrecy. In the 1940s,

> Claude Shannon proved that this goal is impossible unless the two

> communicating parties share a random secret key that is as long as

> the message they want to communicate 10; moreover, that secret key

> can be used once only. In quantum cryptography, however, this

> pessimistic theorem can be thwarted by exploiting both the

> impossibility of measuring quantum information reliably and the

> unavoidable disturbance caused by such measurements. When

> information is appropriately encoded as quantum states, any attempt

> by an eavesdropper to access it necessarily entails a probability

> of spoiling it irreversibly. This disturbance can be detected by

> the legitimate users, allowing them to establish an unconditionally

> secure confidential channel with no need for a shared secret key.

> After we reported 11 the first experimental realization of quantum

> cryptography, Deutsch wrote 12 in New Scientist: "Alan Turing's

> theoretical model is the basis of all computers. Now, for the first

> time, its capabilities have been exceeded." It is interesting to

> note that quantum computers threaten most of the classical

> cryptographic schemes in use today, but that quantum cryptography

> offers an unconditionally secure alternative."

>

> Only if the perfect no-cloning theorem prevents "signal

> nonlocality" as defined in papers by Antony Valentini now at the

> Perimeter Institute. If micro-quantum theory is to macro-quantum

> theory (with hidden symmetries in the ground state of large

> systems) as special relativity is to general relativity, then the

> "unconditionally secure alternative" could be the "Maginot Line" of

> the National Security Corporate State. The Fat Lady has not sung on

> this yet and policy wonks in USG Intelligence should not be lulled

> into a false sense of security by the above kinds of statements.

>

> "The most obvious goal of cryptography always has been the secure

> transmission of confidential information, but the past three

> decades have seen the rise of a host of novel applications for

> cryptographic techniques, such as digital signatures and secure

> multiparty computation. However, all these classical concepts are

> obviously defeated if cheaters are allowed unlimited computing

> power. Moreover, most of their proposed implementations fall prey

> to quantum computing attacks 5. After the success of quantum

> cryptography in confidential communication, it was natural to hope

> that quantum techniques could also assist in designing

> unconditionally secure protocols for these more sophisticated tasks.

>

> One of the simplest tasks is known as 'bit commitment' — a rather

> abstract concept but a crucial stepping-stone to achieving more

> impressive cryptographic goals. In a bit-commitment scheme, one

> party (Alice) commits to a bit by sending something to the other

> party (Bob). Later, Alice can unveil the commitment, thereby

> letting Bob know to which bit she had committed. The scheme is

> 'concealing' if it's impossible for Bob to learn anything about the

> committed bit simply by analysing what Alice sent him when she

> committed; it is 'binding' if it's impossible for Alice to delay

> until unveiling the choice of bit she wants to show Bob.

>

> For many years, the design of an unconditionally concealing and

> binding protocol to implement bit commitment by quantum means was

> considered the key to unlock almost everything we may wish to do

> with cryptography. Unfortunately, it was proven — independently by

> Dominic Mayers13 and by Hoi-Kwong Lo and Hoi Fung Chau 14 — that

> such quantum schemes are impossible.

>

> A fresh perspective

> Quantum mechanics can help cryptography, but only up to a point: it

> does allow unconditionally secure transmission of confidential

> information, but not unconditionally secure bit commitment. These

> two facts are generally considered to be deep theorems of modern

> quantum information science. But do their implications reach beyond

> information science? What might they tell us about the wider

> physical world?

>

> Fuchs — the prime mover in this intellectual venture — has gone

> so far as to suggest that the first of these theorems (the

> possibility of perfect confidentiality), or perhaps others of a

> similar informational flavour, could serve as the basis of a new

> foundation for quantum mechanics, in which information takes centre

> stage. Inspired by the fascinating discussions I had had with

> Fuchs, it occurred to me that the second theorem (the impossibility

> of bit commitment) could be just as fundamental 15. Imagine, what

> if all of quantum mechanics could be derived simply by taking those

> two quantum cryptographic theorems as axioms?

>

> Admittedly, in its original form this idea was trashed by John

> Smolin, who devised an artificial world in which unconditional

> confidentiality was possible but not bit commitment, and his world

> was anything but a quantum one 16. But discussions with Jeffrey Bub

> breathed new life into Fuchs' and my dream. With Rob Clifton and

> Hans Halvorson, he chose to pull away somewhat from cryptography

> and declare more fundamental properties of quantum information as

> their axioms: the fact that no manipulations taking place at some

> point in space can have an instantaneously observable effect at

> some remote other point (the 'no-signalling property'); and that

> information cannot be cloned."

>

> Don't be so sure. However, one can see that factual violation of

> the 'no-signalling property" brings the whole quantum cryptography

> program down like an unstable house of cards. Quantum security

> rests on shaky ground that could turn into quicksand.

>

> "This pair replaced the axiom that transmitting information with

> unconditional confidentiality is possible, and they kept the axiom

> that unconditionally secure bit commitment is impossible.

>

> To derive anything from these information-theoretic essentials,

> they had to assume that the laws of physics can be formalized in

> the framework of mathematical tools known as C*-algebras. But it is

> amazing where their axioms took them: they were able to derive

> basic kinematic features of quantum mechanics, such as the

> principle of interference, the non-commutativity of measurements

> and the existence of space-like separated entanglement 17. A

> fascinating feature in their approach is that the impossibility of

> bit commitment is used to prove not only that entanglement exists,

> but that it must survive indefinitely across time and space —

> which is indeed the single most non-classical property of quantum

> mechanics.

>

> These are only the first steps, but could we eventually base

> quantum mechanics on information-theory axioms alone, without the

> need for specific assumptions about the physical theory (such as

> the use of C*-algebras)? Could we infer more about quantum

> mechanics than purely the kinematic properties mentioned above?

> Which other theorems of quantum information science might make

> powerful axioms for quantum mechanics when we turn the table round?

>

> On that last point, I have a suggestion. Consider the field of

> communication complexity, which concerns the amount of information

> that must be transmitted between two parties to compute some

> function of private inputs that they hold. It turns out that the

> required transfer can be reduced dramatically in some cases when

> the parties share prior entanglement 18. Nevertheless, even in the

> presence of unlimited shared entanglement, some boolean functions

> require a number of bits of communication that grows linearly with

> the input size.

>

> It was discovered by Wim van Dam 19, and independently by Richard

> Cleve, that all boolean functions could be computed with a single

> bit of communication, should physics allow a certain form of non-

> local correlation even stronger than those provided by quantum

> entanglement. What makes this discovery so interesting is that

> those super-quantum correlations do not violate the no-signalling

> property 20. In other words, quantum mechanics exhibits non-local

> properties within the framework of Einstein's causality — but not

> as strongly as it could.

>

> Once again we should ask what all of this is trying to tell us

> about nature. I suggest that this could be another axiom: it is not

> possible to compute all bipartite boolean functions with a single

> bit of communication. How much more of quantum mechanics might be

> derived from it?

>

> A century after Einstein's annus mirabilis, quantum information

> science could turn out to be much more than just an application of

> quantum theory. It could define its very nature."

>

>

> References

> 0.Einstein, A. Ann. Phys. 17, 132-148 (1905). | ChemPort |

> 0.Fuchs, C. A. Preprint at <http://arxiv.org/quant-ph/0205039> (2002).

> 0.Feynman, R. Int. J. Theoret. Phys. 21, 467-488 (1982). | ISI |

> 0.Deutsch, D. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 400, 97-117 (1985). | ISI |

> 0.Shor, P. W. SIAM J. Computing 26, 1484-1509 (1997). | Article |

> ISI |

> 0.Turing, A. M. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 42, 230-265 (1936).

> 0.Wiesner, S. ACM Sigact News 15(1), 78-88 (1983). | Article |

> 0.Bennett, C. H. & Brassard, G. in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Computers,

> Systems and Signal Processing 175-179 (IEEE, New York, 1984).

> 0.Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G. & Ekert, A. K. Sci. Am. 267, 50-57

> (October 1992). | ISI |

> 0.Shannon, C. E. Bell System Tech. J. 28, 656-715 (1949). | ISI |

> 0.Bennett, C. H. & Brassard, G. ACM Sigact News 20(4), 78-82

> (1989). | Article |

> 0.Deutsch, D. New Scientist 1694, 25-26 (9 December 1989). |

> PubMed |

> 0.Mayers, D. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3414-3417 (1997). | Article |

> ISI | ChemPort |

> 0.Lo, H. -K. & Chau, H. F. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3410-3413 (1997).

> | Article | ISI | ChemPort |

> 0.Fuchs, C. A. Preprint at <http://arxiv.org/quant-ph/0105039> 83

> -84 (2001).

> 0.Smolin, J. Quant. Inf. Comp. 5, 161-169 (2005). | ISI |

> 0.Clifton, R., Bub, J. & Halvorson, H. Found. Phys. 33, 1561-1591

> (2003). | Article | ISI |

> 0.Buhrman, H., Cleve, R. & Wigderson, A. in Proc. 30th Annu. ACM

> Symp. Theory of Computing 63-68 (ACM, New York, 1998).

> 0.van Dam, W. Preprint at <http://arxiv.org/quant-ph/0501159> (2005).

> Popescu, S. & Rohrlich, D. Found. Phys. 24, 379-385 (1994). |

> Article | ISI |

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More by Monsieur Brassard

 

http://www.phys.au.dk/quantop/quantuminfunder/abstracts.htm

Gilles Brassard: "Quantum Foundations in the Light of Quantum Information"

 

 

Consider the two great physical theories of the twentieth century: relativity and quantum mechanics. Einstein derived relativity from very simple principles such as: "The speed of light in empty space is independent of the speed of its source" and "Physics should appear the same in all inertial reference frames". By contrast, the foundation of quantum mechanics is built on a set of rather strange, disjointed and ad hoc axioms. Why is that? Must quantum mechanics be inherently less elegant than relativity? Or is it rather that the current axioms of quantum mechanics reflect at best the history that led to its discovery by too many people (compared to one person for relativity), over too long a period of time? The purpose of this talk is to argue that a better foundation for quantum mechanics could lie within the teachings of quantum information science. We postulate that the truly fundamental laws of nature concern information, not waves or particles. For example, it has been proved, from the current axioms of quantum mechanics, that "Nature allows for the unconditionally secure transmission of confidential information", but "Nature does not allow for unconditionally secure bit commitment" (these are standard classical cryptographic primitives). We propose to turn the table round, start from these two theorems and possibly a few others, upgrade them as axioms, and ask how much of quantum mechanics they can derive. This provocative talk is meant as an eye-opener: we shall ask far more questions than we shall resolve!

 

 

Perhaps Mr. Brussard might be interested in my theory and math that states "Information Subsumes Physical Energy"? ;)

 

RMT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: More by Monsieur Brassard

 

The question of free will. If DNA is similar to light waves, and free-will is also caught up in a similar pattern, we must consider the source of this "light".

 

Who's will is in play, ours ( as an individual ) or God's ( as the source & supply )? So perhaps what we perceive as an individaul free will is a collective will, an achievenment of Gods "intentions" for his 'children'.

 

Another point to ponder is whether or not God can be taken by suprise. Was God suprised that Adam and Eve made the choice to not obey His request? Could He possibly have been astonished that they didnt obey Him?

 

Did God return to the garden and noticing the apple was eaten, exclaim.." What the....???? " ?

 

When Adam hid from God, did God really have no clue as to where Adam was hiding?

 

Is God suprised by any choice we make? Obviously, if God was capable of suprise and astonishment, then that would put a question mark on His nature... as we understand Him. So how does free will play into this ideal?

 

And since God basically is infused into everything ( source energy ), everything that goes on is of God. Every thought, every dream, everything is sourced from His energy, so wouldnt any choice we make also be God Himself in action. To deny this would mean that there are voids as to where He is, that there are places He doesnt exist, or is unaware of.

 

 

 

I thought this would be a good place to include in this thread a post from the God? Thread. It seems to fit quite well with the topic of discussion. A tad long, but worth the read.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

""""The following is a paper written by Greg Hatten.

 

 

There are diagrams available, but I did not transfer them to this post. The address below is where the full color with diagrams can be found.

 

http://www.educationplanet.com/search/cache?url=http://users.uniserve.com%2F~ghatton%2Flifespec.html

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THE LIFE SPECTRUM HYPOTHESIS

THE LIFE SPECTRUM HYPOTHESIS

POSSIBLE EXPLANATIONS

FOR

THE NATURE, CREATION AND EVOLUTION

OF

THE DNA MOLECULE AND LIFE WRITTEN BY BY GREG H. HATTON, AScT, MCASI - JUNE 24, 1995

 

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

 

INTRODUCTION

 

This paper is regarding a correlation noticed across various branches of science as well as ancient theological text. The subject is life - the creation of it, possibly by special natural light, and this, in turn, to a possible connection to a God, advanced extraterrestrials or the intelligence of nature which makes up life itself. This short thesis details this major correlation that has been overlooked by science due, likely, to the technical language differences and lack of cohesiveness between the various scientific disciplines. The information is interesting and should be considered carefully by the various scientific disciplines noted herein. Please note that any religious notations here are only used as a potential scientific reference.

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

THE THEOLOGICAL STARTING POINT

 

The starting point here is a quotation from the Holy Bible (1John - 1, 5) which states: "This is the message we have heard from him and declare to you: God is light; in him there is no darkness at all." This is an interesting statement that, if taken literally, says that the intelligence of the universe (Ie: God) - is light. Verse 7 goes on to say "But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, his Son, purifies us from all sin. Putting aside the religious aspects, this statement affirms again that God (Ie: the universal intelligence of life) is in the light. Scientifically this makes sense since we know that life requires light energy in order to begin. Without it there would be no life since photosynthesis would never occur. Still though, what puts the intelligence into the creation of life? Here, science now knows that you can look to DNA (Deoxyribonucleic Acid) as this source for the intelligence of life (Ie: the code).

 

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

DNA - THE NEXT CLUE

 

So this search for the origin of life continues on with a look at DNA. Figure 1 details a representation of a DNA molecule.

 

Figure 1: A DNA Molecule

 

The double helix is now becoming more and more understood by science. The DNA carries the code of life. It carries a biological computer program that specifies a particular type of life whether it be an amoeba or human. Scientists are working hard to identify further secrets about and applications for this knowledge. However, this still does not answer the big question of how did this DNA get here? What made the DNA? What caused it to occur such as it has? Of course there are the various types of molecular bonds that come into play but the thing has occurred with such intelligence. It seems like far too much intelligence to have happened by chance - at least in its original occurrence. We know that DNA replicates itself but how did it get started in the first place?

 

 

 

THE LIGHT CONNECTION

 

Now, take a close look at the double helix. It's overall structure, discovered by Crick and Watson, is striking and famous - it seems so perfect. What is even more remarkable is that the DNA looks very similar to a light wave. Look at a side view of the molecule and you will see that it clearly has a wavelength and amplitude just like a light wave. However, the DNA is three dimensional and regular transverse light waves are only two dimensional. Figure 2 illustrates a 2-dimensional light wave which in this case is an AM wave.

 

Figure 2: A 2-Dimensional Light Wave

 

Study of electromagnetic waves from a first year university text quickly reveals, however, that if two equal component polarized waves are combined perpendicular to each other and with one of them differing in phase by a quarter-cycle from the other. Then the resultant motion of each point corresponds to a superposition of two simple harmonic motions at right angles with a quarter-cycle phase difference. The motion is then no longer confined to a single plane, and it can be shown that each point on the wave moves in a circle in a plane parallel to the yz plane. Successive points on the wave have successive phase differences, and the overall motion of the wave then has the appearance of a rotating helix! Hence, electromagnetic waves can be of exactly the same shape as DNA! Look up a first year university physics text and verify that, simply stated, two transverse light waves can combine and become a helical light wave which can be of the exact same dimensions as DNA! Figure 3 exemplifies this fact.

 

Figure 3: The Creation Of A Helical Light Wave

Additionally, it may be possible that if two circular light waves could be sent out together in tandem then they may be able to take on the appearance of a double helix. Note as well that light waves also have an electrical field that runs on a perpendicular axis to the light wave itself. A possible correlation to DNA here is that the double helical components in DNA are molecularly attached in a ladder formation. It is possible that the electrical fields from two circular light waves may combine in this formation due to their positive and negative components!

 

 

So, it seems that DNA is closely related to electromagnetic waves by its shape. Digging deeper into the study of light waves reveals that, of course, humans have been encoding information into carrier waves within a modulated signal for some time now (Recall figure 2 which illustrates one of these waves). Radio etcetera uses this technique. Electromagnetic waves can carry encoded information - as does DNA! DNA carries the code of all life encapsulated within itself. Simply compare a photo of unravelled DNA to a photo of 8 bit code, created by humanity, and you will see the striking simularity. So DNA and light are comparable in this aspect as well provided that circular light waves can carry encoded information. Perhaps they can with the proper antenna/electronic apparatus? Figure 4 details a picture of 8 bit code. Recall the old keypunch computer cards for visualization here as well.

 

Figure 4: 8 Bit Code

 

An additional study of the DNA molecule shows that it's wavelength (estimated at 3.4 nanometers) corresponds to a wavelength within the electromagnetic spectrum where ultra-violet and gamma rays reside (around the 3-5 nanometer mark). This is particularly interesting since these (specifically UV rays) are the types of waves that cause mutations in the DNA when it is replicating itself. Why is this and why do other wavelengths of light waves not cause this?

 

The theory of light waves includes the principle of superposition which basically says that if two polarized waves of the same wavelength are beamed along with each other, they will combine together to become one wave with the same wavelength but larger amplitude. Since the ultra-violet and gamma rays are of the same wavelength as DNA, they may be combining with the DNA, when orientations are correct, via the principle of superposition. This would violently knock the DNA around while the ray of light passed through - hence, corrupting the information stored within and causing the mutations. DNA, when replicating, would only rarely be affected by UV rays since only correct wave orientations would cause superposition. This connection must also say, however, that the DNA is akin or related to light in order to be affected in this way. Perhaps DNA is a physical manifestation of light (Ie: a creation at the interface between matter and energy) or only that the atoms within the DNA molecule are small enough to be effected by the light waves.

 

Methods used to decode DNA molecules basically flatten the double helix out to reveal the sequences of information held within. This looks the same as taking the corresponding transverse wave components (those before superposition) out of a light wave to reveal their original amplitudes, wavelengths and encoded information.

 

Humans have used different methods for encoding information within light waves such as binary, hexadecimal, hollerith and 8-hole to name a few. The information is encoded into the light waves and sent to destination by a transmitter and received and decoded by a receiver. These human-made encoding systems look strikingly similar to the resultant gene pattern information obtained from unraveling DNA molecules. Note also that the accepted theory of light is that light has a dual nature. Light is considered to have properties which make it act like a particle and those which make it act like a wave. DNA is the same here as well since the shape is wavelike but it is made up of particles.

 

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

THE LIFE SPECTRUM HYPOTHESIS

 

The preliminary information, above, has noted a number of comparisons which seem to suggest that DNA and light are quite similar in many aspects. The following few paragraphs detail possible natural explanations for this correlation of light and DNA. These are to be suggestions to the scientific community. These hypotheses are an attempt to explain the very basis for which DNA, and other biological molecules, are created in the first place. It is stressed here that these are just hypothetical explanations and that they may or may not be correct. The fact remains, however, that there seems to be something about this whole concept which lends itself to further scrutiny by the scientific community. Clearly, research should be conducted in an attempt to verify the connections that have been supposed in this report.

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

The Einstein Mass-Energy Hypothesis

 

It seems as though DNA may be the physical manifestation of light - possibly the opposite side of Einstein's mass-energy equivalence law: E=mc2. Here, possibly, light energy is being converted into matter. One way of testing this would be to check the mass of DNA and determine it's rest energy verses the total energy of a double-circular light wave that is required to form the DNA - (that is if the hypothesis is correct in the first place). If the two are the same, this may be proof.

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

The Electric/Magnetic Field Hypothesis

The other possibility is that the electric, and magnetic fields, created by naturally forming circular ultra-violet and x-rays, may stimulate the molecular bonding required to cause the formation of the DNA molecule. It is now well known, although not completely understood, that static electricity, under the proper conditions and using the correct chemical soup, causes the formation of amino acids. Perhaps this is another natural process which causes the formation of life. It is possible that circular light waves are acting as a template for the formation of DNA molecules. Perhaps natural UV and X-rays, thought to be destructive, are actually creative a very small part of the time while under the correct conditions (Ie: creating life). It may be this natural creative process, happening at the wrong time, which causes mutations but sometimes - causes evolution. This would explain the missing links found between the various species. This may be possible since evolutionary changes may have happened instantaneously by the effect of light which caused a mutation which actually translated into an evolutionary transformation. Hence, there were no intermediate species of the particular creature in question.

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

The Universal God Or Extraterrestrial Hypothesis

It is also interesting to recall that electromagnetic waves can carry information. Perhaps naturally or artificially, electromagnetic waves, of a double helical nature, are interacting with our planet and other planetoids within our system and throughout the universe. Perhaps this is God? Perhaps all the bio-computer data of all the different kinds of life is being beamed throughout the universe - encapsulated within double-helical carrier waves. Humans use light to transmit intelligence over distances so why wouldn't God? A potential proof would be to prepare transverse waves with the same sequences of information as a DNA molecule and combine these by the principle of superposition and beam this into a chemical mix made up of the correct chemicals (Ie: hydrogen, carbon and nitrogen). Perhaps a DNA molecule will spontaneously form to the desired makeup as specified by the encapsulated information in the light beam. This could be a potential experiment.

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

The Random Circular Wave Hypothesis

Another possibility is that circular waves form naturally, and randomly, in our atmosphere and obtain the natural sequences of encoded information by interactions with the air molecules found in the atmosphere. This may explain another way why life has evolved on our planet - as the atmospheric chemical makeup changed, so did the natural encoding of circular light waves and hence the evolution of DNA itself. This makes sense since dinosaur DNA, for example, is more primative than DNA is today. Additionally, it is now well known that the atmospheric content of oxygen was 30% in the days of the dinosaur while it is only 21% today. Ancient air had much less helium content compared to modern air as well. These factors would all alter the orientations of light diffraction/deflection that would occur in the atmosphere and thus change DNA with time as the air mixtures changed.

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

The Advanced Communication Hypothesis

Astronomers have been searching the stars for some signal from other intelligent life. Perhaps, if there are other forms of intelligent life out there, they are using circular waves as their means of beaming information. A circular wave may hold it's energy longer than a transverse wave and thus travel farther and still remain readable similarly to how a propeller is the most efficient means of traveling through water. Additionally, a circular wave may be able to carry more information since it is 3-dimensional. Maybe the SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) astronomers should be looking for circular light waves in their search of the stars for life? Perhaps a transceiver capable of sending and receiving circular light waves should be designed and built. This special technology is likely possible.

 

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

CONCLUSIONS

 

The evidence shown within this document details a number of correlations between electromagnetic waves and DNA and attempts several hypothetical explanations for these correlations. At this time it is suggested that there may be more to this connection and therefore these thoughts should be analyzed collaboratively by experts in the applicable sciences. In general, the applicable sciences are: Theology, Astrophysics, Astronomy, Electronics, Biochemistry, Philosophy as well as others. The similarities between DNA and light seem too close to be ignored. Religious writings from many cultures have been saying that God is Light for thousands of years. The Bible, as one example, makes reference that God is Light at least 10 times. Additionally, one of the old Prophets (Ezekiel 1:16) apparently had a vision where he spoke of an object that "appeared to be made like a wheel intersecting a wheel". Was this Prophet making reference to DNA? This observation is open for interpretation but seems, again, fairly interesting considering what we know about DNA and life today. Additionally, the Koran says that "Allah is the light of the heavens and the earth" and The book of Mormon says that "Christ is the light and life of the world". These are similar statements to the Bible which if taken literally in a scientific format point to the simularities between DNA and light noted in this report.

 

I personally noticed this connection and upon introductory research have not found any data in textbooks which notes any kind of similar connection. Is this correlation just a coincidence or is there something to it? Please send me your thoughts to:

[email protected] Perhaps life is part of the Light Spectrum? Thanks from: Greg H. Hatton, AScT, MCASI.

 

 

Now See The Life Spectrum Hypothesis - Chapter 2 (Added July 1, 1998)

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

REFERENCES

 

Armstrong, Frank B., Biochemistry - 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, New York, 1983.

Sears, Zemansky and Young., University Physics - 7th ed., Addison - Wesley Publishing Company, Don Mills, Ontario, 1988.

Mitchell, B., Concise Encyclopedia of Science and Technology., Peerage Books, London, 1985.

Leach, Malvino., Digital Principles and Applications - 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill Inc., USA., 1981.

Meyers, Robert A., Encyclopedia of Astronomy and Astrophysics., Academic Press, Inc., Toronto, 1987.

Weisz, Paul B. and Keogh, Richard N., The Science of Biology - 5th ed., McGraw-Hill Book Co., Toronto, 1982.

Metcalfe, H. Clark, Williams, John E. and Castka, Joseph F., Modern Chemistry, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Publishers,Toronto, 1982.

Holy Bible - New International Version, Zondervan Bible Publishers, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1984.

Holy Qur'an - M.H. Shakir's, Tahrike Tarsile Qur'an, Inc., Box 1115, Elmhurst, New York.

The Book of Mormon - Corporation Of The President Of The Church Of Jesus Christ Of Latter-Day Saints., Salt Lake City, Utah

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: More by Monsieur Brassard

 

This is all very good compiled information here, took me awhile to read it all!

 

I've come to the startling realization and conclusion that without intelligent life to observe and evaluate, everything would be meaningless…

 

Left with that thought alone, therefore thoughts equal creation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: More by Monsieur Brassard

 

I've come to the startling realization and conclusion that without intelligent life to observe and evaluate, everything would be meaningless…

 

Left with that thought alone, it equals creation?

 

Anthropic Principle!

 

(Don't mean to sound like Creedo, but take a google on the term and see what comes up. I am a fan of the Final Anthropic Principle.)

RMT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: More by Monsieur Brassard

 

What is man that thou are mindful of him? Psalm 8:4

 

Yes, Anthropic Principle also. It may seem that we are just a speck standing on this big planet, but the planet compared with the stars is just another speck and the earth is orbiting the sun and the sun is a huge star and our sun/star may be a big deal to us, but our star is just another speck… So basically we are living on a speck on the edge of a galaxy - It's really not in downtown milky way, its way out in the side… So we're just a speck on a speck orbiting a speck. I'll tell you what else, there is billions and billion of stars and specks and billions of galaxies… So we are a speck, living on a speck, orbiting a speck in the middle of specklessness and perhaps senselessness? But than I begin to think, I have this brain (this little brain) to think about all of this… to think about the vast emptiness of space. I can reason that I'm a speck on a speck in the middle of specklessness and that's cool, that's worthy of respect.

 

And that my friend is worth thinking about… :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Donald Rumsfeld Agrees With RainmanTime!

 

http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/02/17/security.rumsfeld.reut/index.html

 

Even Donald Rumsfeld, in his recent speech to the Council On Foreign Relations, is telling us that INFORMATION is already an essential weapon for waging war in the 21st Century. Here's his quote:

 

"The Pentagon chief said today's weapons of war included e-mail, Blackberries, instant messaging, digital cameras and Web logs, or blogs.

 

'Our enemies have skillfully adapted to fighting wars in today's media age, but ... our country has not adapted,' Rumsfeld said."

 

RMT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Donald Rumsfeld Agrees With RainmanTime!

 

Well I will tell you the news and its not going to be pretty for some on this site…

 

Hello, do you actually think this site isn't monitored?!

 

This site believe it or not is a magnet for terrorists posting their plotted anticipations for future events as well as using the free inbox message feature on this site and all with the use of several usernames… But this still does not fool the big guy… Rumsfeld might have been vague about us not adapting to this threat but there are plenty of measure that have been in place for several years now and I know for a fact on this very forum!

 

Especially when you have topics posted like this:

 

http://www.timetravelinstitute.com/ttiforum/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=time_travel&Number=37947&page=0&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=&fpart=1

 

And if you think echelon has connections, 'this individual' has access to all the personal inbox messages and IP addresses and can follow a trail through any computer better than a bloodhound intoxicated with a pheromone scent in a matter of nanoseconds… There are no such things as firewalls!

 

Who this person is on the forum, I wont tell… But I will tell this individual 'good job'! :)

 

Unfortunately this forum is also intertwined in a conspiracy over the John Titor info… Its part of a forced business venture with the moderator, and incase your wondering this forum is set/programmed to show 'who's online' showing the John Titor info on a continuous basis. Yes folks, its rigged!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Donald Rumsfeld Agrees With RainmanTime!

 

He sees you when your sleeping, he knows when your awake, he knows if you've been bad or good, so be good for goodness sake.\

 

*There is no call for someone to breach both private e-mails and firewalls here.

 

I chose this board, as it was the least obtrusive subject, that I could find.

 

From the sounds of what CAT is saying, he is keying on certain individuals, as he has also snooped into their backgrounds.

 

This is pointless, as I could have chosen the subject of hats, which in his eyes, could have somehow threatened the infrastructure.

 

This person is a fool as he told me i his last private message, that he is capable of going and living in almost any dimensions, which in fact, would make him Mephistopheles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...